Table 3.
Summary of Studies analyzing the costs of implant overdentures and other removable prosthetic options
| Author | Outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial treatment cost | Maintenance or aftercare costs | Total treatment costs | |
| van der Wijk et al.[13] | Direct costs were maximum for transmandibular implant-supported overdentures, followed by permucosal implant-supported overdentures and preprosthetic surgeries. Direct initial costs of conventional CDs were much less than other treatment options ($1058 for CD against $3441 for 2 permucosal implant-retained overdentures) |
Total follow-up costs (through the 1st year) were very high for IOD groups compared to preprosthetic surgery and CD groups ($94 for CD group against $317 for 2 permucosal implant-retained overdenture group). Follow-up costs were least for preprosthetic surgery group ($59) | Total cost of a transmandibular implant-supported overdenture was seven times more than the cost of a new conventional CD. Permucosal implant-supported overdentures are 3.2 times costlier than the conventional CDs Cost of preprosthetic surgery followed by a CD was almost same as a two-implant-retained overdenture |
| Takanashi et al.[14] | For the period after delivery (P2 to P4; up to 1 year), the direct median cost of unscheduled visits was lower for IODs ($57) than CDs ($75), but the difference was not significant. The indirect median cost was also lower for IODs ($146) than CDs ($234), and the difference was significant |
Total costs of scheduled and unscheduled visits were CD $ 4,245 for IODs and CD $ 2,316 for CDs. Total direct cost for an IOD was 2.4 times higher than a CD up to 1 year of prosthesis delivery | |
| Stoker et al.[15] | Mean total costs of aftercare (evaluation period 8.3 years) were €997.43+/−620.20 for 2IBA, €961.21+/−460.80 for 2ISB, €984.32+/−436.80 for 4ITB; the differences were nonsignificant (P=0.94) | ||
| Walton et al.[16] | Median prosthodontic maintenance time over the 1st year after implant delivery was almost identical for both groups, approximately 3.3 h (P=0.37). Within the 1styear of follow-up, 5 patients out of 42 within the single-implant group required retreatment (repair, not replacement). For two-implant group, the number was 2, out of 41 patients | Total component costs (CD $957.14) of one-implant group were significantly lower than that of two-implant group (CD $1678.64) over 1 year time. Also surgical time and prosthodontic time and costs were less in single-implant group | |
| Cristache et al.[17] | Direct initial cost was highest for the M group, followed by L group, B2 subgroup and B1 subgroup respectively. Overall costs of the M group were significantly higher than the other groups. | Total costs at the end of 5th year were highest for M group €2286.34 (SD 224.13), and lowest for subgroup B1 (€1937.45 (SD 115.89)). Cost of complications per patient after 5 years was significantly higher for the B1 subgroup (€356.16). For subgroup B2, Group M, and Group L, the costs were €67.45, €68.34, and €56.30 respectively |
|
| Jawad et al.[21] | The MI group had higher observed mean unscheduled visits costs (≤78 vs. ≤63) | Mean NHS costs for MIs were lower than that for CIs (£296 vs. £688). There was a higher mean patient cost observed for the MI group (£193 vs. £156) | |
IOD: Implant overdenture, CDs: Complete dentures, NHS: National health service