Table 1.
Level of evidence | Confidence in the evidence | |
---|---|---|
1. High | Data derived from meta-analyses or systematic reviews or from (multiple) randomized trials with high quality. | Further research is unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of benefit and risk. |
2. Moderate | Data derived from a single RCT or multiple nonrandomized studies. | Further research (if performed) is likely to have an impact on our confidence in the estimate of benefit and risk and may change the estimate. |
3. Low | Small studies, retrospective observational studies, registries. | Any estimate of effect is uncertain. |
Recommendations – Grade | Wording associated with the grade of recommendation | |
1. Strong | ‘‘must”, ‘‘should”, or ‘‘INASL recommends” | |
2. Weak | ‘‘can”, ‘‘may”, or ‘‘INASL suggests” |
Adapted from GRADE system.
GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation; INASL, Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver; RCT, randomized controlled trial.