Table 1.
Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system evidence grades
Quality of evidence | |
---|---|
A (high quality) | Very confident that the true effect value approximates the effect estimate |
B (moderate quality) | There is a moderate degree of confidence in the effect estimates, and it is possible that the true value is close to the estimates, but there is still a possibility that the two are quite different |
C (poor quality) | The degree of confidence in the effect estimate is limited and the true value may be quite different from the estimate |
D (very low quality) | There is little confidence in the estimates of effects and the true values are likely to be very different from the estimates |
Strength of recommendations | |
Level 1 recommendation (strong) | The benefits clearly outweigh the risks and the credibility of both clinician implementation and population acceptance is high |
Level 2 recommendation (weak) | The benefits are equal to the risks, depending on the specific clinical situation. In general, the preferences of doctors and patients play a more important role in the decision-making process |