Table 2.
The effect of mulberry milk on event-related potential (ERP) (n = 46/group). ∗p value < 0.05 and ∗∗p value < 0.01, respectively, compared to the placebo group.
| Location | Wave | Treatment group | Baseline | T 1.5 h | T 3 h |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fz | N100 latency (ms) | Placebo | 99.31 ± 3.26 | 108.97 ± 1.96 | 104.40 ± 4.19 |
| Mulberry milk 10 g | 103.17 ± 2.86 p value = 0.37 |
98.36 ± 2.66 p value = 0.002∗∗ |
95.20 ± 2.97 p value = 0.078 |
||
| N100 amplitude (μV) | Placebo | 13.96 ± 1.33 | 12.66 ± 1.13 | 15.83 ± 1.25 | |
| Mulberry milk 10 g | 16.13 ± 1.34 p value = 0.256 |
14.32 ± 1.59 p value = 0.400 |
14.88 ± 1.04 p value = 0.561 |
||
| P300 latency (ms) | Placebo | 329.60 ± 2.91 | 329.31 ± 4.57 | 320.72 ± 3.10 | |
| Mulberry milk 10 g | 326.50 ± 5.07 p value = 0.599 |
325.81 ± 4.35 p value = 0.581 |
320.97 ± 4.28 p value = 0.962 |
||
| P300 amplitude (μV) | Placebo | 34.04 ± 2.02 | 32.14 ± 1.65 | 28.68 ± 2.04 | |
| Mulberry milk 10 g | 31.96 ± 2.11 p value = 0.480 |
34.81 ± 1.86 p value = 0.285 |
33.60 ± 1.74 p value = 0.070 |
||
|
| |||||
| Cz | N100 latency (ms) | Placebo | 100.64 ± 2.89 | 109.07 ± 1.95 | 109.03 ± 2.72 |
| Mulberry milk 10 g | 105.50 ± 2.49 p value = 0.205 |
98.39 ± 3.27 p value = 0.008∗∗ |
99.39 ± 3.27 p value = 0.029∗ |
||
| N100 amplitude (μV) | Placebo | 15.54 ± 1.76 | 15.74 ± 2.21 | 17.54 ± 1.69 | |
| Mulberry milk 10 g | 16.73 ± 1.54 p value = 0.611 |
13.91 ± 1.45 p value = 0.482 |
17.06 ± 1.73 p value = 0.843 |
||
| P300 latency (ms) | Placebo | 324.82 ± 4.21 | 320.97 ± 4.85 | 319.36 ± 3.39 | |
| Mulberry milk 10 g | 324.61 ± 5.00 p value = 0.974 |
326.72 ± 3.88 p value = 0.357 |
321.30 ± 4.17 p value = 0.720 |
||
| P300 amplitude (μV) | Placebo | 37.40 ± 2.13 | 30.35 ± 1.71 | 27.59 ± 1.94 | |
| Mulberry milk 10 g | 31.25 ± 3.00 p value = 0.099 |
36.11 ± 1.91 p value = 0.028∗ |
33.93 ± 2.21 p value = 0.035∗ |
||