Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 24;18(8):1683–1696. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13332

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Functional assessment of HvAKT2 and HvHAK1 via BSMV‐VIGS. (a) Phenotype after silencing of HvAKT2 and HvHAK1 in wild barley XZ5 via BSMV‐VIGS. Control and drought correspond to basic nutrition solution (BNS) and BNS + 20% PEG, respectively. (b) qRT‐PCR analysis of HvHAK1 and HvAKT2 in leaves of XZ5. (c) Biomass after silencing of HvAKT2 and HvHAK1 in XZ5 via BSMV‐VIGS. (d) K concentration in leaves of plants after silencing of HvAKT2 and HvHAK1 in XZ5 via BSMV‐VIGS. Inoculated seedlings were grown in BNS for 10 days, followed by PEG‐induced drought for 5 days. Data are mean ± SD (n = 6), and different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).