. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2020 May 13;131:103639. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103639

Table 1.

Intercorrelations among adherence and weight loss variables.

	Mean (SD)	2	3	3a	3b	3c	4	4a	4b	4c	5	6	7
1. Percent weight loss at week 52 (N=150)	9.8 (8.6)	.602^***	.451^***	.255^**	.426^***	.445^***	.557^***	.340^***	.479^***	.558^***	.525^***	.262	.245
2. Percent weight loss at week 6 (N=150)	4.1 (2.4)		.394^***	.369^***	.392^***	.324^***	.349^***	.405^***	.352^***	.290^***	.177	.165	.169
3. Attendance^a (percent of 21 sessions; N=150)	84.2 (27.1)			.511^***	.902^***	.907^***	.549^***	.537^***	.575^***	.451^***	.709^***	.004	.146
3a. Attendance week 1–4^a (percent of 4 sessions; N=150)	94.2 (17.0)				.435^***	.357^***	.264^**	.501^***	.298^***	.170^*	.144	−.058	.017
3b. Attendance week 6–24^† (percent of 10 sessions; N=150)	84.4 (29.7)					.744^***	.561^***	.530^***	.622^***	.434^***	.595^***	.126	.147
3c. Attendance week 28–52^† (percent of 7 sessions; N=150)	77.5 (37.6)						.511^***	.477^***	.513^***	.440^***	.726^***	−.027	.118
4. Food record total (percent complete; N=150)	40.5 (32.0)							.560^***	.932^***	947^***	.463^***	.512^**	.442^**
4a. Food record week 1 −4 (percent complete; N=150)	74.8 (26.7)								.636^***	.373^***	444^***	.180	.062
4b. Food record week 5–24 (percent complete; N=150)	52.2 (37.1)									.770^***	.456^***	.504^**	.333^*
4c. Food record week 25–52 (percent complete; N=150)	27.1 (34.8)										.406^***	.351^*	.307^*
5. Medication adherence^† (percent taken; N=100)	71.2 (33.8)											.169	.285
6. Meal replacement shake consumption (percent consumed; N=50)	54.1 (26.7)												.520^**
7. Portion controlled entree consumption (percent consumed; N=50)	47.2 (23.2)

Notes.

^†

Mean and SD are presented from non-transformed data, but attendance variables were log transformed and medication adherence was square root transformed for use in all analyses.

= p < .05,

^**

= p < .01,

^***

= p < .001.