Table 2.
Prediction of week 52 weight loss from session attendance and food record completion, controlling for condition (N=150).
| R2 change (R2 total) | B (SE) | t | Semipartial correlation | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step l | 0.094 | ||||
| Liraglutide group (vs CMS) | 5.40 (1.68) | 3.216 | 0.258 | 0.001 | |
| Mutlicomponent group (vs CMS) | 5.71 (1.68) | 3.399 | 0.273 | 0.001 | |
| Step 2 | 0.148 (0.243) | ||||
| Liraglutide group (vs CMS) | 3.45 (1.58) | 2.173 | 0.160 | 0.030 | |
| Mutlicomponent group (vs CMS) | 3.85 (1.58) | 2.434 | 0.179 | 0.015 | |
| Percent of sessions attended | 2.03 (0.41) | 4.945 | 0.384 | <0.001 | |
| Step 3 | 0.149 (0.392) | ||||
| Liraglutide group (vs CMS) | 3.86 (1.43) | 2.689 | 0.179 | 0.007 | |
| Mutlicomponent group (vs CMS) | 4.52 (1.43) | 3.155 | 0.209 | 0.002 | |
| Percent of sessions attended | 0.69 (0.44) | 1.586 | 0.109 | 0.113 | |
| Perceznt of food records completed (total) | 0.12 (0.02) | 5.944 | 0.387 | <0.001 |
Note. Percent of sessions attended was log transformed.