Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Rev. 2020 Jun 11;57:100921. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2020.100921

Table 2.

Meta-analytic results of moderator table

Moderator variables No. of participants No. of effect sizes Effect size (r) 95% CI Q I2 p
Categorical
Child developmental status 1.17 .759
 ASD 99 4 0.38*** [.20, .53] .93 .00
 HL 58 6 0.35** [.12, .55] 6.47 .23
 Preterm 77 5 0.30*** [.15, .43] .61 .00
 TD 707 14 0.29*** [.24, .34] 12.86 .00
Publication status .28 .595
 Peer-reviewed 954 30 .26*** [.22, .31] 30.96 .06
 Non-peer-reviewed 139 10 .31** [.12, .47] 13.00 .31
Language test modality 2.55 .110
 Receptive 60 5 .18+ [−.03, .37] 6.19 .35
 Expressive 413 5 .31*** [.25, .37] 3.62 .00
Language test method .43 .511
 Direct child assessment 545 17 .21*** [.15, .27] 13.07 .00
 Parent report 78 10 .29** [.09, .47] 12.70 .291

Continuous
Age at LENA recording .00 .984
Gap between LENA recording and language test 2.66 .103+
***

p < .001

**

.001< p < .01

*

.001 < p < .05

+

.05 < p < .10