Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 9;219(7):e201911047. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201911047

Figure S2.

Figure S2.

Deuterium uptake plot for peptides in FIP200NTD with significant differences and quantification of pulldown assay. (A) Deuterium uptake plot for peptide (74–80). (B) Deuterium uptake plot for peptide (158–169). (C) Deuterium uptake plot for peptide (188–199). (D) Deuterium uptake plot for peptide (314–324). (E) Deuterium uptake plot for peptide (347–361). (F) Deuterium uptake plot for peptide (433–448). (G) Deuterium uptake plot for peptide (458–472). (H) Deuterium uptake plot for peptide (480–489). (I) Deuterium uptake plot for peptide (528–541). (J) Quantification of relative expression efficiency for GST-FIP200NTD in Fig. 2 D. (K) Quantification of relative pulldown efficiency for GST-FIP200NTD in Fig. 2 D. (L) Quantification of relative pulldown efficiency for GST-ATG13MR in Fig. 3 D. All values are mean ± SD.