Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20731. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020731

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Meta-analysis and forest plot and for walk test. Compared to CG, BG demonstrated a greater improvement in walk test (MD = 0.11, 95%CI: [0.02, 0.20], P = .02, I2 = 36%). BG = backward walking group, CG = control group.