Table 2.
DNTM results with different partitioning methods
| Datasets | DNTM (TCD) | DNTM (LN) | DNTM (GN) | DNTM (GD) | Best in DNTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karate | 0.7282 | 0.615 | 0.7185 | 0.5861 | TCD |
| Dolphins | 0.734 | 0.6193 | 0.7232 | 0.7359 | GD |
| Lesmis | 0.755 | 0.6644 | 0.2689 | 0.7034 | TCD |
| Football | 0.75 | 0.6563 | 0.7777 | 0.6493 | GN |
| Polbooks | 0.81 | 0.8138 | 0.8090 | 0.825 | GD |
| Jazz | 0.6904 | 0.7064 | 0.0379 | 0.7016 | LN |
| Power | 0.90 | 0.9513 | 0.8709 | 0.9511 | LN |
| Durgnet | 0.7853 | 0.7299 | 0.8654 | 0.7907 | GN |
| Highschool | 0.755 | 0.5909 | 0.5964 | 0.7329 | TCD |
| Netscience | 0.953 | 0.9154 | 0.8674 | 0.9256 | TCD |
| C.elegans | 0.61 | 0.3473 | 0.0756 | 0.5035 | TCD |
| Bible names | 0.6424 | 0.4156 | 0.1 | 0.5815 | TCD |
| Protein | 0.7958 | 0.8076 | 0.6095 | 0.8171 | GD |
| Internet route | 0.5273 | 0.4305 | 0.01519 | 0.4375 | TCD |
| PGP | 0.7963 | 0.8975 | 0.2042 | 0.9082 | GD |