Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;4:38. doi: 10.1186/s41747-020-00165-2

Table 5.

Comparison between 2ABD in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for different phantom thicknesses on the reference Hologic Selenia Dimensions (device A)

Phantom thickness (cm) Digital mammography (single view) (W/Rh and W/Ag*) Digital breast tomosynthesis (W/Al)
Tube load (mAs) Tube voltage (kVp) 2ABD (mGy) Tube load (mAs) Tube voltage (kVp) 2ABD (mGy)
2.5 50 26 0.49 ± 0.11 39 27 0.95 ± 0.21
3.0 67 26 0.61 ± 0.15 38 28 0.95 ± 0.19
3.5 72 27 0.67 ± 0.15 40 29 1.05 ± 0.20
4.0 82 28 0.77 ± 0.16 49 29 1.18 ± 0.23
4.5 98 28 0.85 ± 0.18 50 30 1.26 ± 0.23
5.0 134 29 1.20 ± 0.24 55 31 1.45 ± 0.26
5.5 138 30 1.26 ± 0.23 60 32 1.66 ± 0.30
6.0 155 31 1.43 ± 0.26 65 33 1.86 ± 0.33
6.5 161 32 1.51 ± 0.28 71 34 2.13 ± 0.38
7.0* 159 30 1.73 ± 0.36 78 35 2.43 ± 0.43
7.5* 174 31 1.96 ± 0.40 82 36 2.70 ± 0.47

Data for 2ABD are presented as mean ± standard deviation. In DM modality, the W-Rh anode-filter combination was selected by the AEC system for a range of 2.5–6.5 cm of phantom thickness, while for a thickness of 7 cm and 7.5 cm the W-Ag (*) was automatically set. On the other hand, only the W-Al option was available for DBT