Table 2.
Feature | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) | Accuracy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PET/CT alone* | 94 | 79 | 73 | 96 | 85 |
Thoracic CECT alone | 82 | 83 | 74 | 89 | 83 |
Combined two modalities | 94 | 93 | 89 | 96 | 93 |
SUVgluc cutoff | |||||
> 5.7 | 82 | 100 | 100 | 91 | 93 |
SUVmax cutoff | |||||
> 4.9 | 82 | 100 | 100 | 91 | 93 |
> 5.2 [28] | 82 | 100 | 100 | 91 | 93 |
> 3.5 [4] | 94 | 79 | 73 | 96 | 85 |
Combined two modalities with cutoff > 4.9 | 94 | 100 | 100 | 97 | 98 |
*The diagnostic cutoff is according to Rahbar et al.[4]