Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 6;10:11044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66907-9

Table 1.

Distribution of the BC risk factors related to familial history (Group 1) in the KBCP dataset.

Feature names Cases (N = 445) Controls (N = 250) All subjects (N = 695) Feature description p-value
Cancer in family 0 196 (44%) 136 (54%) 332 (48%) Whether there is any cancer in family members: 0: No; 1: Yes 0.01
1 249 (56%) 114 (46%) 363 (52%)
Cancer type 1 0 394 (89%) 235 (94%) 629 (90%) Type of cancer in the 1st family member with cancer: 0: Other; 1: Breast 0.02
1 51 (11%) 15 (6%) 66 (10%)
Cancer type 2 0 437 (98%) 249 (99%) 686 (99%) Type of cancer in the 2nd family member with cancer: 0: Other; 1: Breast 0.2
1 8 (2%) 1 (1%) 9 (1%)
First-degree relative 1 0 398 (89%) 238 (95%) 636 (91%) whether the 1st family member with breast cancer is a first-degree relative: 0: No; 1: Yes 0.01
1 47 (11%) 12 (5%) 59 (9%)
First-degree relative 2 0 438 (98%) 249 (99%) 687 (99%) whether the 2nd family member with breast cancer is a first-degree relative: 0: No; 1: Yes 0.3
1 7 (2%) 1 (1%) 8 (1%)
No. of BCs 0 393 (88%) 235 (94%) 628 (90%) Number of family members with BC. 0.04
1 45 (10%) 14 (5%) 59 (9%)
2 7 (2%) 1 (1%) 8 (1%)
BC risk score 0 396 (89%) 238 (95%) 634 (91%) Number of first-degree family members with BC. 0.02
1 44 (10%) 11 (4%) 55 (8%)
2 5 (1%) 1 (1%) 6 (1%)
Lateral 1 0 394 (88%) 235 (94%) 629 (90%) Whether the 1st family member has unilateral or bilateral BC: 0: No tumour; 1: Unilateral; 2: Bilateral 0.06
1 48 (11%) 14 (5%) 62 (9%)
2 3 (1%) 1 (1%) 4 (1%)
Lateral 2 0 437 (97%) 249 (99%) 686 (97%) Whether the 2nd family member has unilateral or bilateral BC: 0: No tumour; 1: Unilateral; 2: Bilateral 0.2
1 7 (2%) 1 (1%) 8 (2%)
2 1 (1%) 0 (0%) 1 (1%)

The P-values denote the differences in the Group 1 features between the BC cases and controls using the chi-squared test for categorical variables. The difference is statistically significant when the p-value < 0.05 (highlighted p-values). P-values were not adjusted for multiple testing.