Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 6;11(7):504. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2695-6

Table 3.

Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression model (N = 97).

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Multivariate analysis Multivariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95%CI) P HR (95%CI) P HR (95%CI) P HR (95%CI) P HR (95%CI) P

Gender

Male vs female

1.047 (0.529–2.073) 0.895 1.132 (0.557–2.300) 0.733 1.385 (0.693–2.768) 0.356 1.427 (0.708–2.874) 0.032 1.835 (0.889–3.787) 0.101

Age

≤45 vs >45

0.643 (0.359–1.042) 0.126 2.084 (0.989–4.393) 0.054 1.918 (0.916–4.018) 0.084 1.958 (0.937–4.094) 0.074 1.905 (0.912–3.979) 0.086

Primary T stage

T1–2 vs T3–4

2.420 (1.296–4.520) 0.006b 1.153 (0.574–2.315) 0.689 0.965 (0.474–1.963) 0.921 1.068 (0.530–2.155) 0.139 1.163 (0.579–2.334) 0.671
Lymph node (N) metastasis 1.582 (0.781–3.204) 0.203 0.404 (0.170–0.959) 0.040a 0.423 (0.178–1.005) 0.051 0.658 (0.296–1.461) 0.304 0.550 (0.247–1.226) 0.144
TNM stage 0.143 (0. 044–0.462) 0.001b 8.530 (11.917–37.960) 0.005b 9.349 (2.098–41.671) 0.003b 5.425 (1.284–22.914) 0.021a 6.796 (1.635–28.251) 0.008b

MiR-450b-5p

high vs low

0.227 (0.112–0.462) 0.000c 0.231 (0.109–0.448) 0.000c / / / / / /

RKIP

high vs low

0.317 (0.160–0.628) 0.001b / / 0.355 (0.172–0.735) 0.005b / / / /

NRF2

high vs low

4.214 (2.076–8.553) 0.000c / / / / 2.747 (1.312–5.751) 0.007b / /

NQO1

high vs low

3.165 (1.597–6.272) 0.001b / / // / / / 2.674 (1.302–5.491) 0.007b

HR hazard ratio, 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

aP < 0.05.

bP < 0.01.

cP < 0.001.