Table 2.

The mean values, mean absolute differences between the real dose and each algorithm, and the comparator p-values between DoseGAN and each alternative algorithm are shown for the CI, V₆₀ of the bladder, V₆₀ of the rectum, and mean dose of the bulb.

	Mean values
	CI	V60-Bladder	V60-Rectum	Mean-bulb
Real	0.81 ± 0.07	5.71 ± 3.68	6.59 ± 3.93	4.13 ± 2.78
DoseGAN	0.79 ± 0.06	6.42 ± 4.06	8.13 ± 4.79	4.79 ± 2.93
GAN	0.79 ± 0.06	7.25 ± 4.35	4.1 ± 3.85	5.04 ± 3.09
DoseNet	0.8 ± 0.06	8.64 ± 3.76	5.88 ± 4.37	5.13 ± 2.49
Unet	0.77 ± 0.07	7.99 ± 3.83	9.15 ± 4.12	3.94 ± 2.88
FCN	0.74 ± 0.1	6.51 ± 4.93	6.55 ± 6.85	3.08 ± 2.53

	Mean absolute difference
	CI	V60-Bladder	V60-Rectum	Mean-bulb
DoseGAN	0.03	1.55	1.67	1.16
GAN	0.04	3.06	3.19	1.76
DoseNet	0.05	3.36	2.71	1.43
Unet	0.06	3.04	3.36	1.66
FCN	0.08	3.44	3.24	1.65

	P-Values
	CI	V60-Bladder	V60-Rectum	Mean-bulb
GAN	0.131377	0.033998	0.023243	0.040747
DoseNet	0.033998	0.073288	0.037248	0.565887
Unet	0.02562	0.028196	0.019044	0.073288
FCN	0.02562	0.015508	0.033998	0.370011

Bold font indicates the least difference between the real and predicted dose and statistically significant p-values.