Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 20;23(7):101301. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101301

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of the Ligand-Binding Modes of CB1 and CB2

(A and B) (A) Superposition of AM6538@CB1 (5TGZ) (blue) and AM10257@CB2 (5ZTY) (orange) ligand-binding pockets and (B) conformational difference of F200 and W258 in antagonist bound CB2 and CB1.

(C) Comparison of the “toggle switch” residue conformation in agonist AM12033@CB2 (6KPC) (gold) and AM10257@CB2 (5ZTY) (orange). (D–G) (D) WIN55212-2@CB2 (6PT0) (yellow) orthosteric pocket shows the direct contact of the ligand with residues F1173.36 and W2586.48 compared with AM10257@CB2 (orange). Comparison of the gross morphology of the receptors: (E) active CB1 and CB2 (F), active CB1 and inactive CB2, and (G) inactive CB1 and CB2. Data used to prepare the figures were obtained from Li et al. (2019), Figures 5A and 5B; Hua et al. (2020), Figures 5C and 5E–5G; and Xing et al. (2020), Figure 5D.