Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Jun;50(3):473–482. doi: 10.1007/s10578-018-0854-0

Table 4:

Regression Analyses

Variable RDS absRDS SMDS absSMDS
B t B t B t B t
Age 0.01 0.03 −0.11 −0.73 0 0.03 −0.01 −0.80
Sex 2.18 1.72 0.46 0.60 0.17 1.72 0.07 1.21
Ethnicity −0.04 −0.03 0.29 0.33 0 −0.03 0.03 0.50
Highest parental education −2.83 −3.35*** 0.75 1.45 −0.22 −3.35*** 0.02 0.64
Income 0.06 −0.20 0.10 0.38 −0.01 −0.20 0 0.04
IQ −0.09 −0.90 0 0 0 −0.43 0 0.22
SCARED- P/C mean 0.37 5.42*** 0.45 10.93*** 0.02 4.01*** 0.04 11.87***
Diagnosis −8.00 −5.51*** −0.51 −0.58 −0.61 −5.51*** −0.09 −1.32
Model R2 0.08 0.18 0.07 0.19
Model F 8.12 19.31 7.22 21.5

Higher raw discrepancy scores (RDS) and standardized mean difference scores (SMDS) indicate higher scores for parents compared to their child. Higher absolute RDS (absRDS) and SMDS (absSMDS) indicate greater discrepancy regardless of the direction of discrepancy. Binary variables were coded as sex (male > female), ethnicity (non-white > white), and diagnosis (anxious > healthy). Information on age, sex, ethnicity, highest parental education, income, child IQ, SCARED-P/C mean score, and diagnosis was available in an overlapping sample of n = 730 dyads.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.