Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 4;8(6):e2792. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002792

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics and Outcomes

Patient Sex Age Injury Area No. RPNI Infection Donor Muscle Postoperative Tinel’s Sign Pain Improved after RPNI Surgery? Follow-Up (wk)
1 Female 71 Neuroma in continuity Palm 1 No BR NA Yes 128
2 Female 39 SF crush injury L SF 1 No BR NA Yes 6
3 Male 63 L RF amputation L RF 2 No BR Negative Yes 6
4 Male 56 Grease gun injury Dorsal hand 2 No BR N/A No 56
Grease gun injury L SF 2 No BR NA 24
5 Female 41 Table saw injury L SF 1 No BR Negative Yes 40
6 Male 55 Crush injury, L RF/SF amp L RF/MF 4 Yes FDS Negative Yes 16
7 Female 23 Crush injury with multiple amp at PIP level L MF 2 No VL NA Yes 8
Crush injury with multiple amp at PIP level L MF/RF 3 No VL NA 24
Crush injury with multiple amp at PIP level L MF/RF 2 No VL NA 104
8 Male 24 Table saw injury 1 digit 1 No BR Negative Yes 8
9 Male 55 Crush injury, dog bite Dorsal hand 1 No BR Negative Yes 13
10 Male 33 Iatrogenic injury Dorsal wrist 1 No BR Negative Yes 11
11 Female 56 R thumb crush Thumb 2 No BR Negative Yes 38
12 Male 32 MVC, traumatic amputation L IF 2 Yes BR Negative No 59
13 Male 47 Traumatic laceration, glass Volar wrist 2 No BR Negative Yes 47
14 Female 46 Crush injury Dorsal wrist 1 No BR Negative Yes 63

BR, brachioradialis; FDS, flexor digitorum superficilias; MF, middle finger; MVC, motor vehicle collision; NA, not available, not documented; PIP, proximal interphalangeal; RF, ring finger; SF, small finger; VL, vastus lateralis.