Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;52:37. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00556-4

Table 3.

Number of variants and QTL detected in the GWAS and meta-analysis for fat and protein percentage

Analysis Fat % prot %
nS FDR nQ nS/nQ nS FDR nQ nS/nQ
AUSB 8871 1.7 × 10−5 56 158 13,955 1.1 × 10−5 52 268
AUSC 9502 1.6 × 10−5 74 128 13,475 1.1 × 10−5 49 275
HOLF 10,124 1.4 × 10−5 22 460 11,033 1.3 × 10−5 35 315
MON 3971 3.6 × 10−5 13 305 5383 2.7 × 10−5 19 283
NOR 2981 4.7 × 10−5 11 271 3379 4.1 × 10−5 16 211
NR 4304 3.0 × 10−5 30 143 6231 2.1 × 10−5 37 168
HOLG 9244 1.6 × 10−5 20 462 10,102 1.5 × 10−5 38 266
BRAU 2483 6.4 × 10−5 13 191 2117 7.5 × 10−5 9 235
FLCK 9492 1.8 × 10−5 20 475 5654 3.0 × 10−5 33 171
GWAS 31,559 124 255 42,518 104 409
META 27,820 9.2 × 10−6 138 202 44,095 5.8 × 10−6 176 251

fat %: fat percentage; prot %: protein percentage; nS: number of significant variants; FDR: false discovery rate; nQ: number of QTL; nS/nQ: number of significant variants per QTL; AUSB: Australian bull dataset; AUSC: Australian cow dataset; HOLF: French Holstein; MON: Montbéliarde; NOR: Normande; NR: Norwegian Red; HOLG: German Holstein; BRAU: Braunvieh; FLCK: Fleckvieh; GWAS: non-overlapping significant variants select in any of the 9 GWAS; META: meta-analysis