Table 4.
Average weight loss percentage and associated standard deviations of sticks of two clones of Norway spruce and Kurile Larch after different extraction treatments.
| Treatment | Spruce 1A | Spruce 2A | Average spruce | Larch 1D | Larch 2E | Average larch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native | 3.7 ± 1.2a, b | 3.3 ± 0.8a | 3.5 ± 1.0a | 2.5 ± 1.5d | 1.2 ± 0.3d | 1.9 ± 0.9d |
| Total | 5.3 ± 1.5a, c | 5.1 ± 1.3b | 5.2 ± 1.4b | 3.2 ± 1.0d, f | 2.8 ± 0.8e | 3.0 ± 0.9e |
| Hydrophobic | 6.0 ± 1.9c | 4.2 ± 0.5a, b | 5.1 ± 1.2b, c | 3.8 ± 1.0e, f | 1.8 ± 0.4d, e | 2.8 ± 0.7e |
| Hydrophilic | 3.6 ± 1.1a, b | 4.6 ± 1.7a,b | 4.1 ± 1.4a, c | 4.3 ± 1.2e, f | 2.6 ± 0.4e | 3.4 ± 0.8e |
For each treatment n = 18, except native of trees with index 1, where n=17. Statistically significant differences on a 95% confidence level are denoted with different letters pairs, all at p ≪ 0.001. Uppercase letters are used for the average trees (column-wise), lowercase for the treatments (row-wise); Letters “a-c” were used for spruce, “d-f” for larch.