Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jun;13(6):1299–1310. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.03.010

Table 3.

Univariate Pooled Diagnostic Performance

Modality Studies Number Sensitivity Specificity Positive PV Negative PV Positive LR Negative LR Odds Ratio
LGE 13 703 0.78 [0.68–0.85] 0.87 [0.73–0.94] 0.86 [0.75–0.93] 0.80 [0.68–0.88] 5.48 [3.03–9.91] 0.25 [0.17–0.36] 38.5 [11.6–128.4]
T1 4 1321 0.85 [0.81–0.88] 0.86 [0.83;0.89] 0.89 [0.84–0.93] 0.80 [0.63–0.91] 6.12 [4.43–8.42] 0.18 [0.13–0.24] 34.1 [19.8–58.7]
ECV 6 1369 0.89 [0.79–0.95] 0.89 [0.86–0.92] 0.92 [0.90–0.94] 0.87 [0.73–0.94] 8.42 [6.22–11.41] 0.12 [0.05–0.25] 85.8 [38.4–192.0]

Pooled values are presented as point estimates [95% confidence interval].

ECV=extracellular volume mapping, LGE=late gadolinium enhancement, LR=likelihood ratio, PV=predictive value, T1=native T1 mapping.