Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 24;10(2):349. doi: 10.3390/rs10020349

Table 3.

Genotypic yield variability of the eight maize hybrids for each growing condition. Values are means ± standard error. Level of significance: **, p< 0.01. Treatments: CA, conservation agriculture; CP, conventional agriculture; LD, low density; HD, high density.

CA CP LD HD
SC513 2.50 ± 0.18 1.52 ± 0.19 2.12 ± 0.34 1.90 ± 0.20
SC621 2.32 ± 0.18 2.60 ± 0.39 2.54 ± 0.19 2.38 ± 0.40
PAN53 3.26 ± 0.13 2.71 ± 0.36 2.82 ± 0.23 3.16 ± 0.33
30G19 2.52 ± 0.15 2.12 ± 0.34 2.22 ± 0.26 2.42 ± 0.29
Zap55 3.72 ± 0.18 3.03 ± 0.39 3.23 ± 0.36 3.52 ± 0.31
Pristine 601 3.16 ± 0.26 2.02 ± 0.37 2.19 ± 0.39 2.98 ± 0.34
PGS61 3.23 ± 0.25 2.61 ± 0.29 2.76 ± 0.25 3.07 ± 0.34
Zap61 3.24 ± 0.29 2.74 ± 0.53 2.95 ± 0.51 3.03 ± 0.35
p-value 0.001** 0.147 0.155 0.007**