Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun;6(2):502–512. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.10.06

Table 2. Comparison of the endoscopic profiles in different generations.

Variable 1st generation endoscope 2nd generation endoscope 3rd generation endoscope
Mechanical profile OD: 6 mm; WC: 2.7 mm; angle: 20° OD: 6.9 mm; WC: 4.2 mm; angle: 25° OD: 9–10 mm; WC: 5.5 mm; angle: 12–20°
Essential working instruments Trephine, grasping forcep, RF bipolar probe Endoscopic burr 3.0–4.0 mm; Kerrison punch 4.0 mm Endoscopic burr 4.5–5.5 mm; Kerrison punch 4.5–5.5 mm
Indication Discectomy; non-migrated or low-grade migrated disc; mainly L5–S1 or some L4–5 disc herniation Lateral recess decompression; discectomy (all level); interlaminar contralateral foraminotomy ULBD; lateral recess decompression
Advantage Less injury to normal structures; directly pass through interlaminar window Bony resection is feasible; most versatile application Efficient in bony work; good resolution of visualization
Limitation Lack of instruments for bony work; only for discectomy at lower lumbar level Time consuming while conducting wide laminotomy Limited movement of endoscope in lateral epidural space