Skip to main content
. 2020 May 31;22(2):206–224. doi: 10.5853/jos.2019.03335

Table 3.

Sensitivity and subgroup analyses for the associations between left ventricular hypertrophy and lacunes or extensive white matter hyperintensities in general and high-risk population studies stratified by study type, exposure and outcome assessment methods, and specific population subsets

Sensitivity and subgroup analyses Lacunes
WMHs
LVH vs. no LVH k* Total no. OR (95% CI) Heterogeneity, I2, P P for subgroup difference k* Total no. OR (95% CI) Heterogeneity, I2, P P for subgroup difference
General population
Overall analysis 5 6,650 1.49 (1.12–2.00) 46%, 0.12 5 4,432 1.73 (1.38–2.17) 0%, 0.77
Study type 0.12 0.77
Cross-sectional 4 5,029 1.40 (0.97–2.01) 47%, 0.13 4 3,805 1.81 (1.41–2.32) 0%, 0.79
Cohort 1 1,621 1.80 (1.25–2.59) NA 1 627 1.37 (0.77–2.44) -
Exposure assessment 0.12 0.77
ECG 3 4,320 1.59 (1.19–2.12) 0%, 0.53 2 2,473 1.87 (1.26–2.80) 0%, 0.33
Only ↑QRS voltage-based criteria 2 2,280 1.57 (1.13–2.19) 21%, 0.26 0.06§ 1 659 1.67 (1.05–2.65) - 0.73§
TTE 2 2,330 1.49 (0.76–2.91) 82%, 0.02 3 1,959 1.67 (1.27–2.20) 0%, 0.73
LVMI ≥95 g/m2 (F), ≥115 g/m2 (M) 2 2,330 1.49 (0.76–2.91) 82%, 0.02 2 1,292 1.67 (1.23–2.28) 0%, 0.42
Outcome assessment - -
CT 0 - - - 0 - - -
MRI 4 5,029 1.40 (0.97–2.01) 47%, 0.13 5 4,432 1.73 (1.38–2.17) 0%, 0.77
High-risk populations
Overall analysis 8 6,879 2.39 (1.32–4.32) 71%, 0.00 11 4,867 2.01 (1.45–2.80) 53%, 0.02
Study type 0.00 0.02
Cross-sectional 6 1,480 3.20 (1.75–5.87) 61%, 0.02 10 4,222 1.74 (1.36–2.22) 12%, 0.34
Cohort 2 5,399 0.97 (0.27–3.53) 75%, 0.05 2 776 2.90 (0.42–19.84) 92%, 0.00
Exposure assessment 0.00 0.06
ECG 6 6,534 1.73 (0.85–3.55) 71%, 0.00 4 1,420 2.41 (0.98–5.90) 78%, 0.00
Only ↑QRS voltage-based criteria 2 900 0.92 (0.27–3.16) 68%, 0.08 - 2 776 2.90 (0.42–19.84) 92%, 0.00 0.00§
TTE 3 940 3.33 (1.53–7.24) 54%, 0.11 6 778 2.31 (1.57–3.39) 0%, 0.91
LVMI ≥95 g/m2 (F), ≥115 g/m2 (M) 0 - - - 2 347 1.84 (1.02–3.31) 0%, 0.51
Outcome assessment 0.00 0.02
CT 2 844 1.97 (1.09–3.55) 0%, 0.37 1 610 1.54 (0.71–3.33) NA
MRI 4 1,062 3.62 (1.00–13.14) 85%, 0.00 10 4,257 2.11 (1.47–3.04) 58%, 0.01
Specific high-risk population subsets 0.02 0.02
Hypertensive patients 5 5,384 3.67 (1.97–6.86) 63%, 0.03 5 551 3.18 (1.70–5.97) 41%, 0.15
Stroke patients 1 595 1.22 (0.37–4.09) NA 4 3,601 1.57 (1.17–2.11) 21%, 0.28

LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; WMH, white matter hyperintensity; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ECG, electrocardiogram; TTE, transthoracic echocardiogram; LVMI, left ventricular mass index; F, female; M, male; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NA, not applicable.

*

Numbers of studies in each category do not always add up to the total for a number of different reasons, e.g., article presents additional analyses, article does not fit in any group, etc.;

Results indicate statistical significance;

Subgroup comparison: “ECG” with “TTE”;

§

Subgroup comparison: “Only ↑QRS voltage-based criteria” (i.e., Sokolow-Lyon/Cornell/Minessota code 3–1) with “LVMI ≥95 g/m2 (female), ≥115 g/m2 (male)”.