Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 15;18:354–366. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2020.06.008

Table 2.

Short Comparison of Imaging Techniques for Assessment of Myocardial Infarction

[18F]FDG-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Advantages high sensitivity, high accuracy for viability detection high spatial resolution, high accuracy for scar detection
Disadvantages exposure to ionizing radiation, lower spatial resolution lower specificity of LGE
Provided information in heart imaging myocardial viability, enhanced glucose uptake in inflammatory cardiac diseases enhanced glucose uptake in hibernating myocardium myocardial function parameter: systolic and also diastolic, infarct size, myocardial edema, area at risk
Limitations interference of inflammation, cost, availability restricted to specialized centers interference by medical devices and metal implants

LGE, late gadolinium enhancement.