Skip to main content
. 2020 May 5;10(7):2317–2326. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401052

Table 2. Parameters of positive selection assumed in simulations and the proportion of polyDFE runs for which modeling positive selection gave a significantly better fit to the data.

γa pa γa pa Proportion of likelihood ratio tests significant Proportion of analyses with gradient < 0.01
With divergence Without divergence With divergence Without divergence
10 0.0001 0.001 0.02 0.07 0.11 0.71
50 0.005 0.98 0.86 0.10 0.77
100 0.01 0.98 0.02 0.03 0.58
500 0.05 1.00 0.39 0.00 0.99
1,000 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.71
10 0.001 0.01 0.99 0.96 0.15 0.71
50 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.98
100 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.97
500 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.94
1,000 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.71
10 0.01 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.03 0.80
50 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.02 0.99
100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 0.95
500 5.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.72
1,000 10.0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.41