Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 4;10(6):979. doi: 10.3390/ani10060979

Table 2.

Growth performance of Muscovy ducks fed different levels of dietary Quebracho tannin (QT) from 42 to 84-d age (n = 6 pens /treatment; 7 birds/pen).

Items Age Diet 1 SEM p-Value
QT0 QT1.5 QT2.5 Linear Quadratic
LBW, g 42 d 1699 1653 1676 14.6 0.541 0.259
56 d 2703 2667 2635 16.4 0.094 0.949
70 d 3408 3272 3330 20.6 0.126 0.023
84 d 3787 3784 3789 19.1 0.956 0.913
ADWG, g/d 42–56 d 71.8 72.4 68.5 0.77 0.084 0.147
56–70 d 50.3 43.2 49.7 0.69 0.688 0.000
70–84 d 27.0 36.5 32.8 0.75 0.001 0.000
42–84 d 49.7 50.73 50.3 0.42 0.571 0.414
ADFI, g/d 42–56 d 241 242 259 4.09 0.063 0.266
56–70 d 232 227 269 7.44 0.010 0.036
70–84 d 221 228 239 5.23 0.188 0.834
42–84 d 231 232 256 4.75 0.014 0.116
FCR, g/g 42–56 d 3.36 3.34 3.83 0.11 0.077 0.230
56–70 d 4.61 5.28 5.46 0.20 0.090 0.536
70–84 d 8.72 6.31 7.35 0.45 0.147 0.052
42–84 d 4.68 4.58 5.11 0.11 0.114 0.172

1 QT0 = basal diet; QT1.5 and QT2.5 = the basal diet supplemented with QT at 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively. Note: SEM: standard error of the mean; LW: live body weight; ADWG: average daily weight gain; ADFI: average daily feed intake; FCR: feed conversion ratio.