Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;10(6):1076. doi: 10.3390/ani10061076

Table 2.

Effect of pasture type and season on in vitro gas production kinetics.

Pasture Type Season p-Value
Variable HS LS Autumn Spring SEM P S P × S
TGP24 218 204 204 218 3.2 * * n.s.
PF 4.30 4.58 4.62 4.27 0.089 n.s. * n.s.
Predicted Michaelis–Menten parameters
A 249 232 234 247 4.0 * n.s. n.s.
C 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.003 n.s. n.s. n.s.
MDR 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.003 n.s. n.s. n.s.
K 6.48 6.52 6.61 6.39 0.147 n.s. n.s. n.s.
n 149 148 148 149 0.02 n.s. n.s. n.s.
ta 3.11 3.1 3.15 3.06 0.079 n.s. n.s. n.s.
tb 13.6 13.7 13.9 13.4 0.35 n.s. n.s. n.s.
tc 28.4 28.9 29.3 28.0 0.93 n.s. n.s. n.s.

HS: high sugar pasture; LS: standard cultivar pasture; SEM: standard error of the mean; P: pasture type; S: season; P × S: interaction between pasture type and season; TGP: 24-h gas production (mL/g OM); PF: partitioning factor (digested OM per TGP); A: asymptotic gas production (mL/g OM); C: degradation rate at half-life (%/h); MDR: maximal degradation rate (%/h); n: shape of the curve; K; ta; tb; tc: time to produce 50, 25, 75 and 90% of gas production, respectively; p *: p ≤ 0.05; n.s.: not significant.