Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;10(6):1076. doi: 10.3390/ani10061076

Table 4.

Effect of pasture type and season on in vitro methane (CH4) output.

Autumn Spring p-Value
Variable HS LS HS LS SEM P S P × S
CH4 (mL/100 mL TGP) 15.7c 17.3a 15.6c 16.4b 0.13 *** * n.s.
CH4 production at 6 h (mL) 16.4 16.2 17.0 17.1 1.13 n.s. n.s. n.s.
CH4 production at 12 h (mL) 25.3 24.5 25.6 25.8 1.70 n.s. n.s. n.s.
CH4 production at 24 h (mL) 33.2 33.4 34.9 34.1 0.65 n.s. n.s. n.s.
Predicted Michaelis–Menten parameters for CH4 production
A 43.8b 59.5ab 61.8a 51.0ab 3.37 n.s. n.s. *
C 0.069a 0.038b 0.037b 0.057ab 0.0046 n.s. n.s. **
K 9.40 20.6 18.5 13.0 2.75 n.s. n.s. n.s.
n 1.22a 0.98b 0.99b 1.11ab 0.044 n.s. n.s. *
ta 3.81 6.20 5.72 4.46 0.622 n.s. n.s. n.s.
tc 23.0 69.5 60.4 38.4 11.57 n.s. n.s. n.s.

HS: high sugar pasture; LS: standard cultivar pasture; SEM: standard error of the mean; P: pasture type; S: season; P × S: interaction between pasture type and season; TGP: total gas production; A: asymptotic methane production (mL/g OM); C: degradation rate at half-life (h−1); n: shape of the curve; K; ta; tc: time to produce 50, 25 and 75% of methane production, respectively; p *: p ≤ 0.05; **: p ≤ 0.01; ***: p ≤ 0.001; n.s.: not significant; Values on the same row followed by different letters present significant differences.