Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 3;10(6):969. doi: 10.3390/ani10060969

Table 4.

Growth curve parameters according to the Gompertz model (G1) for the Bianca di Saluzzo and Bionda Piemontese chicken breeds: comparison with other breeds/hybrids. Data obtained from references.

Item RS1 RS2 HUB B
F M Δ F M Δ F M Δ F M Δ
BWa 6401 6949 +9 4664 5475 +17 3657 4362 +19 2697 3880 +44
b 4.44 4.79 +8 4.20 4.62 +10 4.14 4.37 +6 4.03 4.39 +9
k 0.039 0.042 +8 0.036 0.036 0 0.031 0.031 0 0.021 0.019 −10
BWip 2356 2557 1716 2015 1345 1605 992 1427
Tip 39 37 −5 43 43 0 46 48 +4 69 82 +19
MGR 92 107 +16 62 73 +18 42 50 +19 21 27 +29
Item BS PA BP PC
F M Δ F M Δ F M Δ F M Δ
BWa 2184 3074 +41 2022 2245 +11 2012 2745 +36 1979 2558 +29
b 3.32 3.55 +6 4.35 4.77 +10 3.00 3.25 +10 4.01 4.16 +4
k 0.014 0.014 0 0.021 0.020 −5 0.016 0.015 −6 0.020 0.019 −5
BWip 804 1131 744 826 740 1010 728 941
Tip 86 96 +12 75 81 +8 72 80 +11 72 76 +6
MGR 11 16 +45 16 17 +6 12 15 +25 15 18 +20

Data obtained from references where the model G1 or a derived version was used. F: females; M: males; Δ: ((male average − female average)/female average) × 100; BWa: asymptotic body weight (g); b: shape parameter; k: coefficient of relative growth; BWip: body weight at inflection point (g); Tip: age at inflection point (d); MGR: maximum growth rate at inflection point (g/d). Breed RS1: Ross 308 [46]; RS2: Ross 708 [25]; HUB: Hubbard, crossing JA57 × Redbro [23]; B: Berlanda [22]; BS: Bianca di Saluzzo, present investigation; PA: Padovana Argentata [22]; BP: Bionda Piemontese, present investigation; PC: Padovana Camosciata [22]. Except for [46] (which is a review), reported data do not consider any dietary treatment: for each trial, all birds received the same diet.