Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;10(6):1016. doi: 10.3390/ani10061016

Table 4.

Effect of the farm, piglets’ age and tail docking on lesions and health parameters. The numbers are estimate least-square means of the value.

Farm Piglets’Age Tail Docking
F1 F2 SEM * p-Value T1 T2 SEM * p-Value UT TD SEM * p-Value
Ear LSI 1 9.3 32.1 0.28 0.002 12.8 23.1 0.27 0.132 22.2 13.3 0.27 0.194
Front LSI 1 19.1 48.9 0.21 0.002 24.5 38.1 0.20 0.126 30.9 30.3 0.21 0.946
Leg LSI 1 5.5 7.0 0.32 0.600 5.3 7.4 0.35 0.537 8.1 4.8 0.34 0.325
Tail LSI 1 7.0 13.5 0.27 0.107 5.4 17.6 0.26 0.002 12.9 7.3 0.28 0.187
Tear staining LSI 1 28.5 12.6 0.25 0.027 14.6 24.5 0.24 0.120 13.2 27.1 0.25 0.050
Low BCS 2 10.4 18.5 0.29 0.177 11.9 16.1 0.28 0.457 14.9 12.9 0.28 0.735
Diarrhoea 2 3.3 2.5 0.42 0.561 3.3 2.5 0.42 0.677 2.7 3.2 0.35 0.728

* SEM = Standard error of means. 1 The lesion score index (LSI) is calculated on a range of 0–200 considering the prevalence and severity of the lesions or tear staining in the are considered, where 0 is absence and 200 is all animals with severe lesions/tear staining. 2 The scores were calculated as the prevalence of piglets showing the presence of the clinical sign. Values in bold evidenced significant association (p < 0.05).