Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;10(6):925. doi: 10.3390/ani10060925

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for the type of reproductive strategy used in 19,437 breedings across eight Spanish Holstein farms.

Reproductive Strategy Farms Breedings by Strategy
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
AIs % AIs % AIs % AIs % AIs % AIs % AIs % AIs % AIs %
PRES 364 10.8 180 2.8 544 2.8
DOV 132 16.3 10 0.2 190 12.4 121 3.6 453 2.3
G6G 84 10.3 31 4.4 628 33.7 1046 25.5 367 24.0 423 71.8 753 11.7 3332 17.1
OVS 155 19.1 28 3.9 978 23.8 401 11.9 928 14.4 2490 12.8
OVS-IPD 92 11.3 10 0.2 353 5.5 455 2.3
5dOVS 540 35.3 47 8.0 587 3.0
5dCO 401 21.5 401 2.1
5dCO-IPD 560 30.0 560 2.9
OE 349 43.0 651 91.7 276 14.8 2059 50.2 433 28.3 118 20.1 2482 73.7 4002 61.9 10,370 53.4
NS 245 3.8 245 1.3
Breedings by farm 812 4.2 710 3.7 1865 9.6 4103 21.1 1530 7.9 588 3.0 3368 17.3 6461 33.2 19,437

AIs: artificial inseminations; PRES: timed AI after Presynch; DOV: timed AI after Double Ovsynch; OVS: timed AI after Ovsynch; OVS-IPD: timed AI after Ovsynch with intravaginal progesterone device; 5dOVS: timed AI after 5 days Ovsynch; 5dCO: timed AI after 5 days Cosynch; 5dCO-IPD: timed AI after 5 days Cosynch with intravaginal progesterone device; OE: AI after observed oestrus; NS: natural service.