Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 26;2020:8053939. doi: 10.1155/2020/8053939

Table 3.

Distribution of hookworm infection among pregnant women attending first antenatal visit at Ogur Health Center IV, Lira district, northern Uganda.

Variable Hookworm positive (n = 38) Hookworm negative (n = 308)
Age (years) n (%) n (%)
 ≤20 17 (44.7) 154 (50)
 21-30 14 (36.8) 124 (40.3)
 >30 7 (18.4) 30 (9.7)
Religion n (%) n (%)
 Christian 36 (94.7) 297 (96.4)
 Moslem 2 (5.3) 11 (3.6)
Marital status n (%) n (%)
 Single 9 (23.7) 35 (11.4)
 Married 29 (76.3) 273 (88.6)
Education n (%) n (%)
 None 11 (29.0) 46 (14.9)
 Primary 26 (68.4) 218 (70.8)
 Secondary or higher 1 (2.6) 44 (14.3)
Occupation n (%) n (%)
 Peasant farmer/HWa 33 (86.8) 248 (80.5)
 Civil servant/BWb 5 (13.2) 60 (19.5)
Resident n (%) n (%)
 Yes 38 (100) 291 (94.5)
 No 0 (0) 17 (5.5)
Gestational age n (%) n (%)
 1st trimester 20 (52.6) 154 (50.0)
 2nd-3rd trimester 18 (47.4) 154 (50.0)
Gravidity n (%) n (%)
 Primegravida 11 (28.9) 70 (22.7)
 Multigravida 27 (71.1) 238 (77.3)
Water source n (%) n (%)
 Unsafe 14 (36.8) 47 (15.3)
 Safe 24 (63.2) 261 (84.7)
Boiling drinking water n (%) n (%)
 Yes 2 (5.3) 58 (18.8)
 No 36 (94.7) 250 (81.2)
Pit latrine utilisation n (%) n (%)
 Yes 6 (15.8) 14 (4.6)
 No 32 (84.2) 294 (95.5)
Gardening shoes n (%) n (%)
 Yes 10 (26.3) 121 (39.3)
 Never 28 (73.7) 187 (60.7)
Floor type n (%) n (%)
 Concrete 3 (7.9) 58 (18.8)
 Earth 35(92.1) 250 (81.2)

aHousewife. bBusinesswoman.