Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 8.
Published in final edited form as: Biom J. 2019 Feb 20;61(4):902–917. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700323

Table 3.

Simulation results for scenario 2 with prognostic covariates considered on their original scales (2O) as well as generated from independent normal distributions (2N). The table provides means values and standard deviations (SD) obtained for the summary measures of %Δg = %ΔMTUg, MOT, and NPC. Results are based on 100 duplicated data sets.

Method Scenario 2O Scenario 2N
MOT(SD) g (SD) NPC(SD) MOT(SD) g (SD) NPC(SD)
HC-BPP 10.0 (6.2) 0.840 (0.10) 84.4 (6.8) 9.0 (6.3) 0.860 (0.12) 73.6 (6.2)
KM-BPP 20.0 (9.8) 0.707 (0.16) 83.2 (7.0) 21.0 (9.8) 0.678 (0.16) 72.5 (7.0)
PAM-BPP 22.0 (8.7) 0.689 (0.13) 79.9 (8.1) 20.0 (8.8) 0.725 (0.14) 70.2 (7.3)
LASSO 49.0 (8.7) 0.412 (0.14) 85.1 (8.6) 53.0 (6.4) 0.261 (0.09) 62.3 (7.0)
Ridge 27.0 (6.0) 0.591 (0.10) 73.8 (6.4) 25.0 (5.9) 0.620 (0.10) 68.0 (7.3)
LassoINT 46.0 (10.0) 0.408 (0.14) 89.4 (8.8) 49.0 (7.9) 0.322 (0.11) 61.8 (6.9)
RidgeINT 38.0 (8.8) 0.431 (0.15) 75.4 (5.9) 31.0 (8.4) 0.517 (0.14) 65.1 (5.5)