Table 3.
Results of primary and subgroup meta-analyses by outcome
Meta-analyses | Studies | References | Patients n | Shape of association | Risk ratio | 95% CI | I2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICU admission all | 14 | [25, 37, 39, 51, 52, 54–56, 60, 62, 63, 65, 68, 69] | 898,272 | Linear dose-responsea | 0.63 | 0.56–0.71 | 95.4 |
Neonatal death | 4 | [37, 40, 62, 65] | 533,880 | U-Shapeb |
< 39: 0.59 ≥39: 2.09 |
0.43–0.83 1.18–3.70 |
77.5 |
Respiratory morbidity | 9 | [51, 53, 55, 57, 58, 61, 64, 65, 68] | 57,693 | Linear dose-responsea | 0.64 | 0.51–0.79 | 95.2 |
Hospitalization ≥5 days | 5 | [38, 62, 65, 68, 69] | 59,331 | U-Shapeb |
< 39 0.52 ≥39 2.00 |
0.36–0.75 1.40–2.86 |
96.2 |
Sepsis | 4 | [37, 52, 65, 68] | 42,381 | U-Shapeb |
< 39 0.55 ≥39 3.57 |
0.44–0.67 1.87–6.78 |
21.8 |
Hypoglycemia | 6 | [25, 38, 60, 65, 68, 69] | 46,367 | Linear dose-responsea | 0.84 | 0.79–0.91 | 0.0 |
Apgar Score < 7 | 5 | [39, 56, 60, 65, 69] | 805,274 | Linear dose-responsea | 0.90 | 0.69–1.17 | 65.7 |
Jaundice | 5 | [56, 60, 65, 68, 69] | 32,109 | Linear dose-responsea | 0.71 | 0.66–0.77 | 53.7 |
Respiratory distress syndrome | 5 | [37, 59, 60, 65, 69] | 43,888 | Linear dose-responsea | 0.60 | 0.54–0.67 | 45.0 |
Transient tachypnea of the newborn | 5 | [37, 55, 59, 60, 65] | 40,766 | Linear dose-responsea | 0.68 | 0.54–0.86 | 84.1 |
Pneumothorax | 4 | [44, 59, 60, 67] | 25,121 | Binary (37 + 38 WG vs. ≥39 WG)c | 0.99 | 0.03–39.19 | 72.0 |
Maternal hysterectomy | 2 | [37, 52] | 18,662 | Binary (37 + 38 WG vs. ≥39 WG)c | 1.10 | 0.03–39.35 | 0.0 |
Maternal blood transfusion | 2 | [37, 60] | 15,162 | Binary (37 + 38 WG vs. ≥39 WG)c | 1.21 | 0.02–65.67 | 30.0 |
Meta-analyses of subgroups | |||||||
NICU admission only ERCS | 4 | [37, 39, 54, 60] | 792,107 | Linear dose-responsea | 0.66 | 0.65–0.67 | 0.0 |
NICU death only repeat CS | 2 | [37, 40] | 497,917 | U-Shapeb |
< 39 0.67 ≥39 1.68 |
0.51–0.87 1.07–2.65 |
0.0 |
NICU Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; WG Week of gestation
a Starting at 37 WG, RR for each additional WG
b Starting at 39 WG, RR for each fewer WG and RR for each additional WG
c Comparison of two timeframes; 37 + 38 WG = 37 + (0–6) + 38 + (0–6), 39 WG = 39 + 0