Skip to main content
. 2020 May 4;123(1):17–25. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0844-4

Table 3.

Comparison of Multifrequency Bioimpedance (BIS) and RAVI values by 6 months against subsequent lymphoedema by 24 months.

Multifrequency Bioimpedance (BIS)
BIS value by 6 months Lymphoedema defined by RAVI > 10% Clinical sleeve application P-value Hazard Ratio
No lymphoedema (N = 737) Lymphoedema (N = 99) No lymphoedema (N = 707) Lymphoedema (N = 135)
<3 348 (90%) 38 (10%) 345 (91%) 33 (9%) 0.26a 1
≥3–<5 102 (96%) 4 (4%) 98 (91%) 10 (9%) 0.26a 1.48 (0.74–2.95)
≥5–<10 155 (89%) 20 (11%) 143 (81%) 33 (19%) 0.16a 1.37 (0.79–2.35)
≥10 132 (78%) 37 (22%) 121 (67%) 59 (33%) ≤0.001 3.70 (2.3–5.95)
RAVI
After 6 months up to 24 months Lymphoedema defined by RAVI > 10% Clinical sleeve application P-value Hazard Ratio
No lymphoedema (N = 847) Lymphoedema (N = 141) No lymphoedema (N = 662) Lymphoedema (N = 211)
RAVI < 4% 633 (97%) 15 (3%) 540 (85%) 93 (14%) NS 1
RAVI 4–9% 185 (72%) 71 (28%) 104 (56%) 81 (43%) 0.012 2.41 (1.21–4.80)
RAVI > 10% 39 (41%) 55 (59%) 18 (33%) 37 (67%) ≤0.001 3.09 (2.73–7.13)

NS non-significant.

aNon-significant: note RAVI changes predicted subsequent lymphoedema but BIS changes did not.