Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 11;15(7):1007–1014. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13861119

Table 3.

Associations of Tolvaptan use with urinary lithogenic risk profile

Unadjusted Models Multivariable Models
Outcome Variables NP NO Difference (95% CI) P Value NP NO Difference (95% CI) P Value
Relative supersaturation ratio calcium oxalate (12) 119 265 −0.74 (−1 to −0.45) <0.001 115 248 −0.56 (−0.82 to −0.3) <0.001
Relative supersaturation ratio brushite (9) 118 264 −0.39 (−0.62 to −0.17) <0.001 115 249 −0.33 (−0.54 to −0.11) 0.004
Relative supersaturation ratio uric acid (14) 119 266 −0.85 (−1.1 to −0.55) <0.001 115 249 −0.62 (−0.88 to −0.37) <0.001
Urine volume, L/d (16) 121 280 1.5 (1.3 to 1.7) <0.001 115 249 1.5 (1.3 to 1.8) <0.001
Plasma copeptin, pmol/L (15) 121 261 1.2 (0.99 to 1.3) <0.001 112 227 1.2 (0.98 to 1.4) <0.001
Urine calcium/creatinine ratio, mmol/mmol per d (8) 120 277 0.041 (−0.18 to 0.25) 0.71 115 249 0.31 (0.09 to 0.53) 0.006
Urine phosphate/creatinine ratio, mmol/mmol per d (1) 118 274 −0.32 (−0.64 to 0.01) 0.05 115 249 −0.029 (−0.36 to 0.3) 0.87
Urine uric acid/creatinine ratio, mmol/mmol per d (2) 119 275 −0.057 (−0.33 to 0.21) 0.68 115 249 0.048 (−0.24 to 0.33) 0.74
Urine oxalate/creatinine ratio, mmol/mmol per d (7) 119 273 0.41 (0.07 to 0.74) 0.02 115 247 0.26 (−0.07 to 0.59) 0.14
Urine citrate/creatinine ratio, mmol/mmol per d (6) 119 275 0.13 (−0.08 to 0.35) 0.22 115 249 0.25 (0.05 to 0.46) 0.02
Urine sulfate/creatinine ratio, mmol/mmol per d (10) 119 272 0.43 (0.09 to 0.76) 0.01 115 248 0.52 (0.16 to 0.88) 0.006
Urine pH (5) 119 268 0.40 (0.09 to 0.7) 0.01 115 249 0.20 (−0.03 to 0.44) 0.10
Urine ammonium/creatinine ratio, mmol/mmol per d (3) 118 270 −0.34 (−0.61 to −0.06) 0.02 115 249 −0.048 (−0.30 to 0.21) 0.72
Urine titratable acidity/creatinine ratio, mEq/mmol per d (4) 118 264 −0.42 (−0.75 to −0.1 0.01 115 249 −0.13 (−0.40 to 0.14) 0.35
Urine NAE/urine creatinine, mEq/mmol per d (11) 114 236 −0.53 (−0.89 to −0.16) 0.004 112 231 −0.54 (−0.90 to −0.17) 0.004
Urine NGIA/creatinine ratio, mEq/mmol per d (13) 118 266 0.59 (0.25 to 0.93) <0.001 114 244 0.57 (0.26 to 0.88) <0.001

Associations between the explanatory variable Tolvaptan treatment with risk factors of kidney stone formation as outcome variables were assessed. All continuous outcome variables were scaled to the SD, and therefore the β coefficient for the presence of Tolvaptan treatment versus no treatment corresponds to the difference of an increase of 1 SD in each outcome. The number of participants, the number of observations, differences, adjusted differences, their 95% CIs, and the corresponding P values are indicated for each model. Multivariable models are adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, eGFR, NAE, and height-adjusted total kidney volume. Numbers in brackets in each row header indicate the numeric increments in outcome to which each β coefficient in the full multivariable model three corresponds, the highest number representing the highest increment in outcome associated with Tolvaptan. P values are indicated for the presence of Tolvaptan treatment. NP, number of participants; NO, Number of observations; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NAE, net acid excretion; NGIA, net gastrointestinal alkali absorption.