Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 12;15(7):1056–1065. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13821119

Table 1.

Potential end points for clinical trials in primary hyperoxaluria

End Point Pros Cons
Clinical end points
 Stone events Affects how most patients with primary hyperoxaluria feel and function Standards for measurement and longitudinal monitoring lacking
Accurate methods of measurement that do not rely on ionizing radiation are needed
Reliability in CKD stages 3b–5 unknown
 Kidney failure Important to patients, easy to measure May not have many events in a trial, particularly if trial is conducted in the available number of patients with a reasonable length of follow-up
 Oxalosis Important to patients, severe morbidity May not have many events in a trial, particularly if trial is conducted in the available number of patients with a reasonable length of follow-up
Surrogate end points
 Worsening kidney function (GFR slope) Accepted as surrogate end point for other conditions May not detect change in patients with slow progression
Easy to measure
Rapid decline would be highly supportive of clinically meaningful benefit
 Urine oxalate Causal role in stone formation and kidney damage in CKD 1–3a and relationship between baseline urine oxalate and kidney failure Magnitude of change needed to predict clinical benefit across primary hyperoxaluria types warrants further study
Available data support use of substantial change as surrogate end point for traditional approval in patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 with CKD 1–3a May not be useful in CKD 3b–5 due to reduced kidney function to excrete oxalate
Lesser treatment effects or effects in patients with primary hyperoxaluria without very high baseline levels reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit
 Plasma oxalate Reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit due to causal role in systemic oxalosis in CKD stages 3b–5 Magnitude of change in plasma oxalate in CKD stages 3b–5 likely to predict clinical benefit requires further study
Causal role in stone formation and kidney damage (CKD stages 1–3a) Value in CKD 1–3a for prediction of clinical outcome remains to be established
Limited availability of laboratory measurement. Results vary by method

Data supporting these conclusions are heavily influenced by primary hyperoxaluria type 1, which accounts for the majority of patients with primary hyperoxaluria. Small numbers of patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 2 and primary hyperoxaluria type 3 in primary hyperoxaluria registries do not yet provide a similar strength of evidence for these biomarkers in other forms of primary hyperoxaluria.