Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;123(1):92–100. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0864-0

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate cox analysis of RFS in the training cohort (n = 195).

Factor RFS
Univariate Multivariate
Hazard ratio 95% CI P value Hazard ratio 95% CI P value
Sex (female vs. male) 1.467 0.874–2.462 0.147 NA
Age, years (≤50 vs. >50) 1.165 0.792–1.713 0.437 NA
HBsAg (negative vs. positive) 1.167 0.686–1.983 0.569 NA
AFP, ng/ml (≤20 vs. >20) 1.248 0.844–1.845 0.267 NA
GGT, U/l (≤54 vs. >54) 1.832 1.255–2.676 0.002 1.652 1.117–2.441 0.012
Liver cirrhosis (no vs. yes) 1.739 1.023–2.956 0.041 1.989 1.156–3.423 0.013
Tumour size, cm (≤5 vs. >5) 1.592 1.086–2.333 0.017 1.420 0.935–2.154 0.100
Microvascular invasion (no vs. yes) 1.640 1.110–2.423 0.013 1.523 0.707–3.277 0.282
Tumour differentiation (I–II vs. III–IV) 1.661 1.104–2.499 0.015 1.509 0.996–2.287 0.052
TNM stage (I vs. II) 1.713 1.133–2.590 0.011 1.107 0.492–2.490 0.805
BCLC stage (0 vs. A) 1.083 0.645–1.818 0.762 NA
HCC-IHC classifier (high vs. low) 1.649 1.133–2.400 0.009 1.593 1.083–2.344 0.018

Cox proportional hazards regression.

RFS relapse-free survival, AFP α-fetoprotein, ALT alanine aminotransferase, GGT γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, TNM tumour–nodes–metastasis, BCLC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, HR hazard ratio, CI confidential interval, NA not adopted.