Table 2.

Correlation of ROI-Pairs with TULIA in ROI-Pairs Showing Significant Between-Group

Group		Healthy Controls & Patients Combined								Healthy Controls Only								Patients With Schizophrenia Only
ROI-pair		L Precent - L IPL	L Precent - R IPL	L Precent - L SPL	L Precent - R SPL	R Precent - L IPL	R Precent - L SPL	R Precent - R SPL	L STG - R STG	L Precent - L IPL	L Precent - R IPL	L Precent - L SPL	L Precent - R SPL	R Precent - L IPL	R Precent - L SPL	R Precent - R SPL	L STG - R STG	L Precent - L IPL	L Precent - R IPL	L Precent - L SPL	L Precent - R SPL	R Precent - L IPL	R Precent - L SPL	R Precent - R SPL	L STG - R STG
T	r	−.25	−.25	−.27	−.12	−.27	−.33	−.20	.43	−.18	−.14	−.28	−.15	−.13	−.39	−.18	.46	−.08	−.01	.00	.22	−.13	.01	.09	.29
P	r	−.27	−.22	−.31	−.18	−.29	−.36	−.24	.39	−.16	−.01	−.29	−.23	.07	−.37	−.18	.37	−.12	−.02	−.03	.24	−.18	.01	.08	.28
I	r	−.18	−.21	−.19	−.07	−.21	−.26	−.17	.33	-.12	−.17	−.18	−.08	−.14	−.33	−.19	.35	−.05	−.05	.00	.13	−.09	−.02	.06	.22
P ML	r	-.29	−.20	−.33	−.17	−.30	−.35	−.23	.27	−.22	−.03	−.33	−.19	−.13	−.38	−.15	.25	−.08	.05	−.02	.28	−.16	.00	.09	.07
P IT	r	−.14	−.04	−.14	−.07	−.18	−.19	−.11	.34	−.12	−.02	−.19	−.10	−.01	−.26	−.07	.23	−.04	.10	.08	.12	−.14	.08	.11	.37
P TR	r	−.22	−.25	−.27	−.16	−.23	−.30	−.22	.37	.01	.03	−.09	−.10	.03	−.14	−.08	.41	−.28	−.27	−.26	−.01	−.25	−.24	−.15	.24
I ML	r	−.12	−.10	−.15	−.05	−.16	−.20	−.14	.21	.01	.06	−.11	.04	−.03	−.20	−.03	.20	−.01	.01	.02	.11	−.04	.02	.02	.12
I IT	r	−.16	−.12	−.09	−.06	−.21	−.20	−.15	.28	.14	.14	.18	0.12	.14	.01	.07	.21	−.09	.04	.01	.10	−.13	−.05	.03	.13
I TR	r	−.15	−.23	−.21	−.11	−.17	−.24	−.16	.33	−.15	−.25	−.23	−.19	−.17	−.33	−.27	.27	−.04	−.12	−.06	.11	−.08	−.05	.05	.29

Note: Precent, precentral gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; SPL, superior parietal lobule; STG, superior temporal gyrus; P, pantomime; I, imitation; ML, meaningless; IT, intransitive; TR, transitive; R, Spearman rho. Bold correlations are significant and pass Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.