Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;94(14):e00436-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00436-20

TABLE 2.

Significance analysis of RNA copy numbers from pA/BV-, BVΔERNS_comp-, and BVΔE1-infected SK-6 or SK-6-BV-ERNS cellsa

Cell type or supernatant and comparison Significant? Summaryb Adjusted P value
SK-6-BV-ERNS supernatant
    2h BVΔERNS vs 2h pA/BV No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔERNS vs 2h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔERNS Yes * 0.0187
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h pA/BV Yes * 0.0202
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h pA/BV vs 2h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔERNS Yes * 0.0187
    2h pA/BV vs 48h pA/BV Yes * 0.0202
    2h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h BVΔERNS Yes * 0.0187
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h pA/BV Yes * 0.0202
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    48h BVΔERNS vs 48h pA/BV No NS 0.9611
    48h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔE1 Yes * 0.0187
    48h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔE1
Yes * 0.0202
SK-6-BV-ERNS cells
    2h BVΔERNS vs 2h pA/BV No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔERNS vs 2h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔERNS Yes * 0.0155
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h pA/BV Yes *** 0.0001
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h pA/BV vs 2h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔERNS Yes * 0.0155
    2h pA/BV vs 48h pA/BV Yes *** 0.0001
    2h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h BVΔERNS Yes * 0.0155
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h pA/BV Yes *** 0.0001
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    48h BVΔERNS vs 48h pA/BV No NS 0.0594
    48h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔE1 Yes * 0.0155
    48h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔE1
Yes *** 0.0001
SK-6 supernatant
    2h BVΔERNS vs 2h pA/BV No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔERNS vs 2h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔERNS No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h pA/BV Yes ** 0.0028
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h pA/BV vs 2h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔERNS No NS >0.9999
    2h pA/BV vs 48h pA/BV Yes ** 0.0028
    2h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h BVΔERNS No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h pA/BV Yes ** 0.0065
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    48h BVΔERNS vs 48h pA/BV Yes ** 0.0028
    48h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    48h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔE1
Yes ** 0.0028
SK-6 cells
    2h BVΔERNS vs 2h pA/BV No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔERNS vs 2h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔERNS No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h pA/BV Yes * 0.043
    2h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h pA/BV vs 2h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔERNS No NS >0.9999
    2h pA/BV vs 48h pA/BV Yes * 0.043
    2h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h BVΔERNS No NS >0.9999
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h pA/BV Yes * 0.043
    2h BVΔE1 vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    48h BVΔERNS vs 48h pA/BV Yes * 0.0468
    48h BVΔERNS vs 48h BVΔE1 No NS >0.9999
    48h pA/BV vs 48h BVΔE1 Yes * 0.043
a

One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey`s multiple-comparison test was performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.1 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

b

*, <0.05; **, <0.01; ***, <0.001; NS, not significant.