Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 18;12(12):12206–12221. doi: 10.18632/aging.103397

Table 5.

Associations between F1 prenatal famine exposure and F2 DNA methylation with the mediation of F1 DNA methylation.

Predictor(F1) Mediator(F1) Outcome(F2) Total effect Estimate,(95% CI) Proportion via mediation Estimate,% Sensitivity analysis
R^2* R^2~
Paternal exposure cg13528513 cg13528513 -0.016 (-0.030 to -0.003) 28.66 0.16 0.112
Paternal exposure cg20906621 cg20906621 -0.013 (-0.025 to -0.001) 25.38 0.04 0.033
Paternal exposure cg17160506 cg17160506 -0.018 (-0.028 to -0.008) 30.98 0.09 0.067
Maternal exposure cg13528513 cg13528513 -0.020 (-0.032 to -0.009) 29.31 0.09 0.066
Maternal exposure cg20906621 cg20906621 -0.031 (-0.048 to -0.014) 32.65 0.16 0.112
Maternal exposure cg17160506 cg17160506 -0.023 (-0.030 to -0.015) 29.97 0.09 0.067

The predictor is F1 prenatal exposure to famine, the mediator is F1 DNA methylation, and the outcome is F1 ΔeGFR. R^2*, the proportion of residual variances. R^2~, the proportion of original variances that were explained by the omitted confounding