Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Genet. 2020 May 25;52(7):740–747. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0631-4

Figure 2 |. Performance of CAUSE and other MR methods in simulated data.

Figure 2 |

a, False positive rate averaged over 100 simulated data sets in settings with no causal effect and a proportion of correlated pleiotropic variants ranging from 0 to 50%. b, Power averaged over 100 simulated data sets in settings with a causal effect and no shared factor. c, Comparison of false positive-power trade-off. We compare the power when γ=0.05 and q = 0 to the false positive rate γ = 0, q = 0.3 and η=0.05. There are 100 simulations each in the causal and non-causal scenarios. Curves are created by varying the significance threshold. Points indicate the power and false positive rate achieved at a threshold of p ≤ 0.05 or GCP^>0.6 for LCV.