Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Jan 9;34(8):839–851. doi: 10.1037/adb0000546

Table 3.

Class Enumeration Results for Offspring (Panel 1) and Fathers during Their Adolescence (Panel 2)

Panel 1: Offspring
Number of classes Number of parameters Log likelihood AIC BIC Sample size adjusted BIC Entropy Class sizes Lo-Mendell-Rubin k versus k+1 classes
1 class 14 −688.00 1403.99 1451.69 1407.32 NA 223 NA
2 classes 30 −614.75 1289.50 1391.71 1296.64 .74 95/128 144.82, p < .001
3 classes 46 −593.32 1278.64 1435.37 1289.59 .86 75/134/14 42.45, p = .029
4 classes 62 −593.32 1310.64 1521.89 1325.40 .89 14/0/75/134 11.50, p = .387
Panel 2: Fathers during adolescence
Number of classes Number of parameters Log likelihood AIC BIC Sample size adjusted BIC Entropy Class sizes Lo-Mendell-Rubin k versus k+1 classes
1 class 15 −565.15 1160.29 1201.21 1153.80 NA 113 NA
2 classes 31 −519.89 1101.79 1186.34 1088.36 .81 44/69 89.33, p = .006
3 classes 47 −497.35 1088.71 1216.90 1068.35 .82 43/23/47 44.60, p = .009
4 classes 63 −481.05 1088.10 1259.93 1060.81 .92 23/23/31/36 33.37, p = .006
5 classes 79 −473.79 1105.57 1321.03 1071.35 .90 24/11/19/34/25 14.46, p = .187

Note: AIC = Akaike information criterion. BIC = Bayesian information criterion.