Table 3.
Imaging modalities recommended at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up.
Imaging modality | At diagnosis | Follow-up | |
---|---|---|---|
Echocardiography | • Main imaging modality to diagnose left ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction • Clues for diagnosis of etiology • Prognostication (left/right ventricular function; degree of mitral regurgitation, presence of diastolic impairment) |
• Prognostication (left/right ventricular systolic function improvement, mitral regurgitation improvement: left ventricular restrictive filling pattern improvement) |
Main imaging technique during follow up—should be repeated at regular intervals |
CMR | • Accurate assessment of volumes and systolic function • Differential diagnosis • Identification of cause • Prognostic stratification, including risk of sudden cardiac death (right ventricular involvement, late gadolinium enhancement) |
• Increasingly used for prognostication | Role of CMR during follow-up needs to be further assessed |
CT coronary angiogram | • Identification of cause (exclusion of ischemic heart disease—to be used in patients with low pre-test probability for coronary artery disease) | Not used | |
PET/SPECT | • Tissue characterization—can aid in the diagnosis of the cause of left ventricular dysfunction (for example, sarcoidosis or cardiac amyloidosis), which has implications on treatment and prognostication | In the case of sarcoidosis, 18F-FDG PET is used to monitor the response to steroids |
CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; CT, computed tomography; PET, positron emission tomography; SPECT, single photon emission computed tomography; 18F-FDG, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.