Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 31;82(5):2463–2481. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02017-y

Table 4.

Mean response times (RTs) and cueing scores (in ms) of Experiment 3 as a function of target assignment, target type, and cue validity

Target assignment Target type Cue validity
Valid Invalid Cueing score
Double line (n = 41) Social target 712 (96.1) 719 (95.8) 8 [0, 15]
Non-social target 715 (95.7) 719 (95.8) 4 [-2, 10]
Overall 714 (95.9) 719 (95.8) 6 [1, 11]
Single line (n = 33) Social target 730 (95.2) 726 (95.4) -3 [-12, 5]
Non-social target 753 (95.6) 748 (95.6) -5 [-14, 4]
Overall 741 (95.4) 737 (95.5) -4 [-12, 3]

Note. Accuracy rates (in %) are given in parentheses, 95% confidence intervals are given in brackets, cueing score = RTinvalid – RTvalid, deviations between the differences of mean RTs and the cueing scores are due to rounding