Table 3.
Comparison of our study with literature.
| Authors | Population | SRT schedule | Median follow-up | Med survival | Local control | Cerebral control | Toxicities | Salvage therapy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% NSCLC |
Bowden 201512 Retrospective |
N = 720 nBM = 1 (38%)-19 RPA ≤ 2: 98% Previous WBRT 52% |
18-20 Gy/1f ID 50–80% GK |
8 months (range 1–124) | 8.5 months (95% CI 0.5–158) | 80% | 58% | NR | 24% |
|
Zairi 201411 Retrospective |
N = 89 nBM = 1 (82%)-6 RPA ≤ 2: 78% |
18–26 Gy/1f ID 50% GK |
28 months (range 1–99) | 24 months (95% CI NR) | At 1 year: 91.5% | At 1 year: 79% |
Acute: 10% G1-2 0% G3-4 |
22% | |
|
Our study Retrospective |
N = 100 nBM = 1 (67%)-6 DS-GPA ≥ 2.5: 48.5% RPA ≤ 2: 88% |
18-36 Gy/1-5f ID 80% CK |
33 months (range 20–64) | 10.1 months (95% CI 7.8–13.9) | At 1 year: 78.7% | At 1 year: 43% |
Acute : 15% G1-2 2% G3 |
30% |
LC lung cancer, UK unknown, nBM number of BM treated by patient, ID Isodose, GK Gammaknife™, CK Cyberknife™, LINAC linear accelerator.