Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 9;98(5):skaa114. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa114

Table 5.

Effects of cattle breed, Holstein or Angus, and basal diet, grain or forage, on ruminal VFA

Grain1 Forage1 P-value2
Item Time after feeding, h Angus Holstein Angus Holstein SEM Diet Breed Diet × Breed
Animals,n 5 6 6 6
Acetate, mM 4.1 0.05 0.25 0.47
 0 32.3 33.5 44.5 45.7 0.06
 3 44.6 44.6 44.5 46.7 0.04
 6 51.3 56.7 49.6 48.0 0.03
Propionate, mM 2.8 <0.01 0.55 0.20
 0 11.7 13.6 12.5 12.7 0.12
 3 19.6 19.9 14.4 13.8 0.09
 6 25.3 26.7 17.8 16.7 0.05
Butyrate, mM 1.2 <0.01 0.92 0.13
 0 7.8 8.1 5.9 6.7
 3 9.6 8.3 6.3 6.8
 6 9.8 9.6 7.6 7.7
Total VFA, mM 12.1 <0.01 0.51 0.62
 0 64.0 61.3 70.4 71.9 0.11
 3 73.9 79.1 72.0 74.3 0.10
 6 91.0 100.6 81.3 78.0 0.08
A:P3 0.3 <0.01 0.84 0.35
 0 2.9 2.7 3.6 3.7
 3 2.4 2.4 3.1 3.4
 6 2.2 2.3 2.9 2.9

1Grain = diet contained 71% cracked corn, 20% grass hay, 7% soybean meal, and 2% mineral and vitamin supplement; Forage = diet contained 9.25% cracked corn, 80% grass hay, 8.75% soybean meal, and 2% mineral and vitamin supplement.

2There were no Diet × Breed × Hour interactions (P ≥ 0.12) nor Breed × Hour interactions (P ≥ 0.39); there was a Diet × Hour interaction (P ≤ 0.01) on acetate, propionate and total VFA, but not for butyrate and A:P ratio (P ≥ 0.58); there was an effect of Hour (P < 0.01) for all VFA measured.

3acetate:proprionate.