Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 30;11:1419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01419

TABLE 3.

Fit indices for the models (N = 314).

Model χ 2 df GFI CFI NFI TLI RMSEA Model comparisons Δχ 2 Δ df
Step 1: testing the relations between need satisfaction and motivation
M1stability 154.50 57 0.94 0.95 0.93 0.92 0.074
M1causality 130.53 53 0.94 0.96 0.94 0.93 0.068 M1stability-M1causality 23.97** 4
M1reversed 148.48 53 0.94 0.95 0.93 0.92 0.076 M1stability-M1reversed 6.02 4
M1reciprocal 126.54 49 0.95 0.96 0.94 0.93 0.071 M1stability-M1reciprocal 27.96** 8
M1final 133.65 54 0.94 0.96 0.94 0.93 0.069 M1causality-M1reciprocal 3.99 4
M1reversed-M1reciprocal 21.94** 4
Step 2: testing the relations between motivation and heavy work investment
M2stability 233.84 75 0.92 0.96 0.94 0.93 0.082
M2causality 209.63 70 0.93 0.96 0.94 0.93 0.080 M2stability-M2causality 24.21** 5
M2reversed 176.27 70 0.94 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.070 M2stability-M2reversed 57.57** 5
M2reciprocal 167.75 65 0.94 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.071 M2stability-M2reciprocal 66.09** 10
M2final 179.97 71 0.94 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.070 M2causality-M2reciprocal 41.88** 5
M2reversed-M2reciprocal 8.52 5